Saturday, August 31, 2019

(3) Great Commanders of the Middle Ages

Dark Ages (480 AD-700 AD)

Clovis (466-511) -

Flavius Belisarius (505-565) -

Narses (478-573) -

Flavius Heraclius (575-641) -

Muhammad ibn Abdullah (570-632) -

Khalid ibn al-Walid (585-642) -

Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufyan (602-680) -


Early Medieval Period (700-1000)

Charles Martel (686-741)

Pepin the Younger (714-768)

Charles the Great (742-814)

Krum the Fearsome (760-814)

Abu Muslim Khorasani (718-755)

Harun al-Rashid (763-809)

Tahir ibn Husayn "al-A 'war" (775-822)

Alfred the Great (849-899)

Simeon the Great (864-927)

Otto the Great (912-973)

Brian Boru (941-1014)

Basil the Bulgar Slayer (958-1025)

Mahmud of Ghazni (971-1030)

Tughril (990-1063)


High Medieval Period (1000-1250)

Canute the Great (995-1035) -

Robert Guiscard (1015-1085) -

William the Conqueror (1028-1087) -

Rodrigo Diaz de Vivar (1043-1099) -


Henry I of England (1068-1135) - One of the sons of William the Conqueror, he had two older brothers. William II succeeded as King of England and Robert II succeeded as Duke of Normandy. Henry was given no lands and so he purchased the County of Cotentin. In 1088 Normandy was in chaos and King William II and Duke Robert II were in conflict, many barons in Normandy and England also rebelled. Henry was arrested by his brother Robert but later set free. In 1090 he supported Robert against rebellious lords in Normandy and saved his castle of Rouen from these rebels. In 1091 William II invaded Normandy and forced his brother Robert to negotiate. Duke Robert was paranoid and banished his younger brother Henry. In the same year William II and Robert II declared war on their brother Henry and besieged him at Mont Saint-Michel, he surrendered and fled into France. Henry planned to overthrow Robert and take Normandy and in 1094 William II invaded Normandy again, Henry went to London. William's campaign ended in failure but Henry was gaining support from barons and was now loyal to William. Together they campaigned in Vexin in 1097 and 1098. King William II died in a hunting accident in 1100 and since Robert was on Crusade in Jerusalem it was Henry who took the throne of England as King Henry II. In 1101 Robert invaded England for the throne, many barons joined him. Henry II maneuvered and intercepted them at Alton and they made peace. Then in 1102 Henry II purged the barons which were not loyal to him, some rebelled and he took their castles of Arundel, Tickhill, Shrewsbury and Bridgnorth. Normandy was still in chaos so Henry II invaded in 1105, he defeated his brother Robert at Tinchebray in 1106. In 1113 Henry II supported his nephew Theobald II de Blois against rebel barons. In 1108 and 1114 he carried out campaigns in Wales. A revolt broke out in Alencon in 1118 and when Henry went to put them down he was defeated by count Fulk V of Anjou. In 1119 he took Breteuil from his son-in-law Eustace. Then made an alliance with Fulk V of Anjou. In Vexin he defeated the army of King Louis VI of France and Robert's son William Clito. In 1120 his son William Adelin drowned at sea and caused a succession crisis. Fulk V of Anjou turned on Henry once again and supported William Clito. In 1123 Henry besieged the rebels in Normandy and fought them at Bourgtheroulde where he captured them in 1124. To prevent the French from supporting the rebels, he had his son-in-law Emperor Henry V lead a campaign from the east. Emperor Henry V died in 1125 and needing a successor he had his daughter Matilda remarry count Geoffrey V of Anjou in 1127. In 1135 Geoffrey V and Matilda supported a revolt in Normandy so Henry campaigned against them, he fell ill and died at the end of the year. His nephew Stephen de Blois claimed the throne of England and began a war with Matilda and Geoffrey V of Anjou. Eventually Henry's grandson Henry II, the son of Geoffrey V and Matilda, would become king.


Frederick I Barbarossa (1122-1190) -


Henry II of England (1133-1189) - Perhaps the most prestigious of the Plantagenets, he ruled an empire in all but name. His campaigns extended into Scotland, Wales and Ireland. At the start of his reign as Duke of Anjou and Normandy he was required to press the claim of his mother, Empress Matilda, in order to take the throne of England. This he managed to do militarily by defeating the enemy of his mother King Stephen (son of Adela of Normandy). Although the war was unpopular amongst the clergy and nobility, and so a peace was negotiated, Stephen's son died and the succession passed on to Henry. His real claim to fame was the defeat of the Great Revolt of 1173. He defeated his three sons Henry, Richard and Geoffrey as well as Louis VII of France. The rebels and their allies were defeated in Northumbria, East Anglia and Normandy. His final campaign against his rebellious son Richard and Philip II of France came at the very end of his reign, in which he acceded to Richard's demands and died within a few days. At the time there was an interest among the rulers of Europe to go on Crusade, what the Third Crusade would have been like under Henry is unknown but would have been interesting.

Nur ad-Din Zangi (1118-1174) -


Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub (1138-1193) -

Richard the Lion Heart (1157-1199) -


Late Medieval Period (1250-1490)

Baibars (1223-1277) -

Ruggiero di Lauria (1245-1305) -

Edward I Longshanks (1239-1307) -

Robert I de Brus (1274-1329) -

Vettor Pisani (1324-1380) -

Edward III of England (1312-1377) -

Edward the Black Prince (1330-1376) -

Bertrand du Guesclin (1320-1380) -

Nuno Alvares Pereira (1360-1431) -

Timur (1330-1405) -

Jan Zizka (1360-1424) -

Francesco Bussone da Carmagnola (1382-1432) -

Henry V of England (1386-1422) -

Joan of Arc (1412-1431) -

Edward IV of England (1442-1483) -


Gjergj Kastrioti Skanderbeg (1405-1468) -

Janos Hunyadi (1406-1456) -

Stefan III Cel Mare (1433-1504) -

Murad II (1404-1451) -

Mehmed II (1432-1481) -

Saladin the Strategist: An Underappreciated Commander

"Salah ad-Din" Yusuf ibn Ayyub, Sultan of Egypt and Syria 


Was it strong and grizzled knights with combat experience what dominated Medieval wars or was it their skilled commanders? It could be that the two were indistinguishable in the Medieval period. At least in the cases of Saladin he was a more scholarly and strategically minded commander with a skill for organization. Even so he comes off in the historiography as a very underappreciated commander. More focus is given to his crusader opponents. Despite Frederick Barbarossa's victories against rebellious lords in Germany or against the forces of the Duchies in Poland, the city-states of Italy, the Byzantines and the Anatolian Turks he suffered crippling defeats in Italy proper given the fact that he was forced into protracted conflict. Barbarossa was only able to salvage the situation and reclaim territory using diplomacy. Richard the Lionheart as well was unable to seize significant territory in France. During the crusades he won notable tactical victories over Saladin in the Holy Land but failed utterly in his goal to take Jerusalem. This was despite having a significant advantage in troops over Saladin, with regards to quality and possibly quantity. 

Saladin was not an incompetent military commander, as one might claim from solely a focus on tactical engagements such as at Montgisard, Tyre, Acre, Arsuf and Jaffa.
Strategically he was an extremely skilled commander, due to his strategies he was able to wipe out Guy de Lusignan's army at Hattin. Tactical ability was not a huge factor in this campaign since the Crusaders were hungry, thirsty, demoralized and suffering from extreme heat. This campaign led to his besieging and taking Jerusalem without opposition from any force in the field.
His strategy at Arsuf would also have provided him with a very high chance of winning the battle of Arsuf, despite the fact that he ultimately lost that battle tactically. Saladin's battle plan at Arsuf was quite ingenious and involved drawing Richard in through skirmishing and harassing with mounted archers and light infantry. Ultimately this plan failed because Richard noticed and exploited the flaw in his plan. Namely that Richard did not permit himself to be drawn in a charge and open his flanks to encirclement. Then Saladin's army went against the plan and tried to charge Richard's defensive square formation, playing into Richard's hands and being defeated in combat. Thus Saladin lost the major engagement of the Third Crusade. For this reason Saladin changed focus to strategic containment and a flexible defense, carried out through maneuver.

Saladin's strategies and flexibility outside of the battlefield prevented Richard from reaching Jerusalem. Saladin used scorched earth and harassment to subvert Richard's march and force him to retreat towards the coastline. Generally Saladin's priority being placed on the overall strategic objective allowed him to achieve success on his campaigns. It cannot be denied that he lost battles and some could be seen as being quite embarrassing but the truth is he won a fair share of battles as wells. More importantly though he succeeded in conquering and ruling Egypt and expanding his territory into every direction. Even if he wasn't a tactical mastermind that doesn't make his strategic, logistical, organizational or operational skill any worse. For instance his serving as chancellor for the defeated Fatimid Caliph in Egypt and then gradually expanding his power to the point that he could dethrone this Caliph and crown himself Sultan of Egypt. These actions also allowed him to remove himself from Nur ad-Din's rule and gain favour with the Abbasid Caliph of Baghdad by supplanting the Shia rule in Egypt. More impressive was his capitalizing on the death of his former lord Nur ad-Din Zengi to invade that ruler's territory in Syria and Upper Mesopotamia. He did this systematically and methodically, chipping away at Zengid territories and using both military force, diplomacy and political scheming carried out from an understanding of feudal politics within Islamdom and the tribal politics of the various peoples of the region. By seizing control of Egypt and Syria he was able to take control of key trade routes, conquer key territories within the Middle East as well as attack the Kingdom of Jerusalem from two sides. Therefore Saladin's career could be divided into three periods: his conquest of Egypt and his consolidation as a ruler, his expansion into Syria and the removal of the Zengids and his legitimization of his position within Islam by conquering Jerusalem. At the time of his death Saladin was perhaps the most powerful and prestigious ruler within Islam.

But the main reason for why Saladin lost in those battles was perhaps one in the same as the reason he succeeded as a conqueror. This was because of his means and method. Namely it was due to the feudal Turkic nature of his military force. The composition of his armies being a wide range of light cavalry and infantry and slightly heavier infantry. Due to these reasons Saladin's tactical options were quite limited when faced with opponents such as the Crusader states which could field extremely powerful heavy knights that essentially melted the majority of units in Saladin's army in close combat. However due to the light composition of Saladin's army this gave him a huge strategic advantage against the Crusader states which was a far more mobile force in the terrain of the Middle East with a wide array of flexibility as well as operational and strategic options. Saladin's army could not even compare to the Crusader armies since in terms of training his troops he would be at a disadvantage, though this is not to say that most of his soldiers were not professional soldiers. As Saladin's army was mostly made up of Kurdish and Turkish mercenaries (which were reorganized into feudal formations) as well as Mameluke slave soldiers and then filling up the ranks with Arab recruits (both professional soldiers and militias). The Arabic troops however were considered to be rather poorly equipped and of poor quality and mostly used for garrisoning cities or as light infantry. As the armies of the area were dominated by Turkish troops and doctrines. In terms of armaments his mostly Turco-Kurdish force was still at a disadvantage as they lacked the strong armour and complex equipment such as the Arbalest. In fact Saladin opted to purchase equipment from Frankish merchants when he had the chance. The whole of his campaign plans hinged on quickly raising a large force (his army having a core of elite veterans and filled up with weaker infantry and cavalry through feudal and militia levies) and moving rapidly through the terrain to attack a city or army at a strategic disadvantage. As his army could maneuver to create for these strategic options and avoid the weaknesses which affected the Crusader armies in this terrain. He was rather successful and led to many armies being caught off guard or encircled (Hattin, Arsuf, multiple battles against the Zengid Emirs). 

Saladin experienced large amounts of success against the Zengids despite many cities being able to hold out in long sieges. Compared to the rather logistically strained Crusader armies which were limited to traveling along the coast and only moving in rough terrain from one source of water to the other. Certainly the Crusaders had to travel on a north to south axis due to the geographic position and topography of their states. But very rarely did the Crusader armies successfully invade Syria or broke out of Palestine. The Second Crusade was an utter failure when it came to capturing Damascus. Even during the First Crusade the Crusader armies were starving as they traveled through Anatolia and of course famous examples such as the Crusader defeats at the hands of Nur ad-Din Zengi at Bosra, Damascus, Inab and Aintab (in Syria) and at the hands of Saladin at al-Babein, Marj Ayyun, Jacob's Ford and Hattin (despite the fact that Hattin was within their own territory inside of Palestine near the Sea of Galilee and the Jordan River). Saladin knew this and exploited it and achieved operational and strategic victories. When it comes to Saladin he and his army were not limited to campaigning within Palestine and Jordan as his military operations also ranged to Syria, Egypt, North Africa, Northern Iraq and Arabia. That is what Middle Eastern armies of the time were for, rather than campaigning against European castles littered across a small area.

He was clearly capable in maneuvering his troops and defeating his enemies operationally. The simple fact is that the average Turco-Kurdish feudal soldier was no match against the average knight; in battle Saladin was always at a disadvantage against them even if he could bring numerical superiority to bear. Judging by the First Crusade and its aftermath or the other battles of the Third Crusade where Saladin did not take part and it appears very much the same. The Crusaders were unbeatable juggernauts compared to the Middle Eastern armies. The strategic realities of the time in the Crusader States against Muslim Emirates was tactically different but strategically similar from an Emir against another Emir scenario.
If anything the fact that Saladin recognized these defects and worked within his strategic limitations, as well as his accomplishments, proves that he was quite good.

There are different types of military commanders and not all of them are best suited to front line command or fighting battles. 
Most would agree that Saladin was not a military commander such as King Richard, who led his troops into battle, Saladin was more the chess player who orchestrated large scale strokes. But that aside a handful of battles are not enough to say that a commander is a failure. The expansion of his realm and ultimate success shows quite the opposite. Even if a particular tactical engagement showed a commander's limitations that does not mean that they would not improve or learn from their mistakes. The Battle of Montgisard in itself, fought against King Baldwin the Leper, was the result of Saladin's baggage train being bogged down and then his army being taken completely by surprise. Had Saladin's army been in a compact formation there is nothing that Baldwin could have done but due to the circumstances there is very little which Saladin could have done save for abandoning his baggage train and retreating or trying to protect the baggage train, there were no other options under those circumstances. Even in that case Saladin moved forward on his horse and attempted to reorganize his formations mid-battle, to create a front line against the attacking forces of King Baldwin.

The concept was mostly that of maneuverability on and off the field of battle and had lots of emphasis on projectile weapons such as arrows and javelins. Tactics such as those used at Arsuf were tried and tested methods which Saladin used before (however most of his tactics seem more in line with Hattin, that is to say indirect and unorthodox) and which the local Emirs had employed successfully against the Crusaders (such as Nur ad-Din Zengi). Technically Saladin had the advantage that he had more control over his forces and vassals as compared to the rather less cohesive forces of Jerusalem and the Crusaders. Saladin increased the size of his coffers and army meaning that he could train his forces over time and had a very good core of troops. Saladin also tried to follow European standards of armaments and armour to make heavier troops and equip them with things such as crossbows. That said their cavalry definitely lacked the powerful punch of Knights and were mostly used to attack a flank (usually attacking the enemy's left flank) but not before trying to wear down the enemy with projectiles so that they would crumble before the cavalry charge.

Usually Saladin employed two main commanders to lead his troops in battle (though he had many others): his nephew Taqi al-Din (son of his deceased eldest brother Nur ad-Din Ayyub) and his Kurdish general Gokbori, both of which were known for being highly aggressive field commanders. The most aggressive commanders were given control of the right flank as traditionally the right flank was used on the attack, while the left flank defended and the center provided support. Taqi ad-Din had been sent on campaigns into Cyrenaica, Libya and Tunisia. Gokbori for his part was also made governor over various areas in Syria and Iraq and even campaigned against the Zengids in the area of the Upper Euphrates. Saladin's older brother Turanshah was also a notable commander in his own right and Saladin had sent him off to campaign in Nubia, Tunis, Hejaz and Yemen. It is true that Nur ad-Din had sent Turanshah to Egypt to oversee Saladin's actions and in the hope that they would fight a civil war between them. Instead Saladin rewarded his older brother with a large fief and as Saladin was the main administrator and planner Turanshah did not contest his brother's rule. Turanshah went on to serve as a capable governor in Egypt, Yemen and Syria (he would die in 1181). Saladin's younger brother Sayf ad-Din was also capable. Sayf ad-Din had served his brother Saladin as a logistics officer, administrator and governor in Aleppo. Taking advantage of both feudal and Islamic politics he succeeded in overthrowing Saladin's son and grandson in Syria and then Egypt respectively. Sayf ad-Din also had to put down an attempt by the Zengids to restore their realm.

Indeed this family was essentially a military family of the time. Their father Ayyub and uncle Shirkuh had served Nur ad-Din Zengi and his father Imad ad-Din Zengi. Ayyub had been governor of Tikrit under Emir Shadhi and when he took up service with Imad ad-Din he was made a commander in the Zengid army. He commanded the rear guard in a battle against the Seljuks at Tikrit, thereby allowing Imad ad-Din and Nur ad-Din to retreat and saving their lives. He was then made governor of Baalbek and briefly defended that city before surrendering it to the Burid emirs of Damascus. Both Ayyub and Shirkuh negotiated the capture of Damascus from the Burids and Ayyub was made that city's governor. Later when Saladin and his uncle Shirkuh had conquered Egypt and Saladin made himself the vizier there, Ayyub joined him and was given Alexandria, Damietta and Damanhur as his fief. Being ethnically Kurdish and raised among Turks, Saladin was exposed to the warrior cultures of the Middle East. He developed his military abilities from his family and when on campaign with his uncle Shirkuh. However Saladin also displayed scholarly interests which both translated into his administrative and strategic ability. He was also said to have an inherent cunning to his character and this was noticed by Nur ad-Din who attempted to curb Saladin's growing power and thereby the influence of the Ayyubid family as well. 

It is interesting to note that Saladin has been remembered within Islamic historiography as more of a trickster than a warrior. No doubt this impression comes from the manner by which he seized power in Egypt and for his turning against his Zengid overlords, ultimately overthrowing them. He was also ignored in favour of the more successful Rukn al-Din Baibars who defeated the declining Crusader states and defended Palestine from the Mongols at Ain Jalut in 1260. It is true that Saladin retook Jerusalem but his inability to reclaim the coastal cities was seen as a failure on his part by other Muslims. Regardless he became the foremost Islamic leader of his times and he did so as an officer in his uncle Shirkuh's campaign against the Crusaders, Byzantines and Fatimids in Egypt. By the end of his life he had conquered Egypt, Syria and Northern Iraq. His territories stretched as far west as Kairouan in Tunisia, as far south as Nubia and Yemen, as far north as Khartabirt on the far reaches of the Upper Euphrates and as far east as Irbil in Kurdistan. He had also conquered Jerusalem and Latakia from the Crusaders. In addition to this he had gained the political support from the theocratic Abbasid Caliph in Baghdad and had made alliances and received tribute from the Seljuq Sultan of Rum and the Ortuqid beys of Diyarbekir, while also coming to an agreement with Emperor Isaac II of Constantinople. His dynasty persisted in its control of the Middle East until 1260, the Mameluke usurpers continued this state until 1517. Saladin's empire and successor state being only supplanted by another Turkish power which had learned the methods of gunpowder warfare (the Ottomans).

Generals of the 18th Egyptian Dynasty: The Rise of the New Kingdom (1550 BC-1292 BC)

Ahmose, son of Ebana (18th Dynasty) - An Egyptian officer who served under Ahmose I, Amenhotep I and Thutmose I. He and his family came from Lower Egypt in Nekheb. He is known because of the biography written on his tomb; according to this text Ahmose enlisted (as his father Baba had done) and served under Ahmose I in his campaign to oust the Hyksos and he participated in the siege of Avaris. Slaying the Hyksos in battle, Ahmose son of Ebana was awarded the gold of valor on two occasions. The city of Avaris was sacked and the Hyksos were defeated. Pharaoh Ahmose I continued with campaigns against the Hyksos and their vassals in Canaan. Ahmose I besieged Sharuhen for three years. Later Ahmose I campaigned in Nubia, quelling revolts against Egyptian rule, Ahmose son of Ebana served in these campaigns as well. Under the next pharaoh, Amenhotep I, Ahmose son of Ebana again fought against Nubian rebels. Then in the reign of Thutmose I he was again sent to Nubia where he commanded a fleet in the Nile and fought against rebellious Nubian tribes. He then campaigned with Thutmose I in Syria where the Egyptians marched as far as the Euphrates River. His grandson Paheri was made a scribe and tutor to Thutmose I's son Prince Wadjmose.

Ahmose Pen-Nekhbet (18th Dynasty) - Another notable from Nekheb. He was a state official and military officer serving the pharaohs Ahmose I, Amenhotep I, Thutmose I, Thutmose II, queen Hatshepsut and Thutmose III. In the reign of Ahmose I he took part in the campaign in Canaan. Under Amenhotep I he fought in Nubia, probably together with Ahmose son of Ebana. he was involved in the famous Syrian campaign of Thutmose I. Finally in the reign of Thutmose II he campaign in Sinai against the Shasu Bedouin raiders. During the reign of the regent queen Hatshepsut, he was allowed to hold the royal seal, was made a chief treasurer and a courtly herald. He was also the tutor of Hatshepsut's daughter Princess Neferure. He died during the rein of Thutmose III. Both he and his brother Khaemwaset were given honors at court and allowed to build lavish tombs.

Hormeni (18th Dynasty) - Originally a scribe in the court of Ahmose I, he was made the "haty-a" of the city of Nekhen (essentially a magistrate or small governor). Nekhen was the third district of Upper Egypt, but he was also given authority over Lower Nubia. He served there for many years and sent much tribute from Nubia. It is unclear what happened in Nubia at the time since there was much conflict between the Hyksos in Lower Egypt and Nubians with the Pharaohs of Middle and Upper Egypt prior to Ahmose I's reign. Both Ahmose I and his immediate predecessors campaigned in Syria. Ahmose I's campaigns probably started around the end of Hormeni's tenure as magistrate, because Ahmose I then organizes Nubia under a Viceroy ("Sa-nisut-n-Kush"; the King's Son of Kush).

Ahmose Si-Tayit (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Probably the first to be appointed to the position of Viceroy of Kush. He was given the position by Pharaoh Ahmose I as a means to control the conquered regions of Nubia. Pharaoh Ahmose I reunified Egypt by expelling the Hyksos from the Delta and began the 18th Dynasty. He also fought against the Nubians in counter-insurgency campaigns. During his reign Ahmose I probably expanded his control to the first or second Cataract of the Nile. Ahmose Si-Tayit was no doubt a part of these programs. He is the only Viceroy mentioned in the reign of Ahmose I, prior the administration of the region seems to have been in the hands of a court official, the magistrate of Nekhen.

Ahmose Turo (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Ahmose also called Turo, was the son of Ahmose Si-Tayit. Turo served under his father as the Commander of Buhen, in the reign of Ahmose I. Under Amenhotep I and Thutmose I he succeeded his father as Viceroy of Kush. There were insurgencies by the Nubians during his tenure and he no doubt played a role in suppressing these revolts. There were many campaigns in Nubia under Amenhotep I and some in the reign of Thutmose I as well. The Egyptians invaded as far as the Third Cataract of the Nile and conquered the city of Kerma. Amenhotep I built settlements, temples and fortresses along the Nile as far as Kerma. Thutmose I put down a major revolt, attacked the region of Kerma the next year, executed the rebel chiefs and kings and built a canal at the First Cataract. Turo was also made an important courtier, as was his son Ahmose Patjenna.

Prince Amenmose (18th Dynasty) - The eldest son and intended heir of Thutmose I, unfortunately he predeceased his father. His two brothers were Wadjmose and Thutmose II. He was given the rank "Great Overseer of Soldiers" by his father and likely took part in his campaigns in Syria. Appointing Princes and members of the royal family to these military ranks was a long tradition ever since the Middle Kingdom.

Seni (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Seni succeeded Turo as the Viceroy of Kush. He was made Viceroy in the reign of Thutmose I and continued to be Viceroy into the reign of Thutmose II. Of course it makes sense to assume that he had a major role in putting down rebellions during the reigns of those kings. He must have left office in the 2nd year of Hatshepsut's rule.

Nehsi (18th Dynasty) - An official during the regency of queen Hatshepsut. He was given the royal seal and made chief treasurer. According to some theories he may have been of Nubian descent. He was put in charge of Hatshepsut's expedition to the land of Punt to the south of Nubia. With five large ships and a few hundred men Nehsi sailed down the Red Sea and then marched to Punt. Nehsi brought with him soldiers, diplomats and scholars. Establishing good relations with the King and Queen of Punt, he brought back emissaries and many goods (such as ebony, incense, myrrh, ivory, cattle, gold and exotic animals). The expedition was a success and is one of the few foreign campaigns in the reign of Hatshepsut.

Penre (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - The Viceroy of Kush during the early regency of queen Hatshepsut. Tasked with controlling the region of Kush and sending tribute back to the capital. Hatshepsut's reign was rather peaceful and so Penre's administration of the south must not have been problematic. He is recorded with many court titles and his lavish tomb was discovered in Thebes. He must have been in office between the Queen's 2nd and 18th years of her reign.

Inebny (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Was also called Amenemnekhu, he served as Viceroy of Kush from Hatshepsut's 18th year of her regency until the 22nd year of Thutmose III's de facto reign (as Thutmose III succeeded his father Thutmose II as a child). It is unclear what occurred during Inebny's tenure. He was removed from his position not long after Thutmose III assumed power. Perhaps this was to purge Hatshepsut's appointees or because he was incapable. There were campaigns in Nubia during the reign of Thutmose III, it is possible that Inebny disgraced himself with poor performance.

Thanuny, scribe of the King (18th Dynasty) - Thanuny was the scribe who recorded the events of the Megiddo campaign. He is recorded as being a military officer and advisor in the reign of Thutmose III. At the very least he was present during the Megiddo campaign in 1457 BC.

Djehuty (18th Dynasty) - Known mainly from the Egyptian tale "The Taking of Joppa" and some contemporary records. Djehuty was an officer of the expansionist pharaoh Thutmose III. In the inscriptions he is mentioned as "the king's scribe", "overseer of troops" and "overseer of the northern foreign countries". In the story the city of Joppa, in southern Canaan, rebels against Pharaoh. Djehuty, likely as an official in Asia, goes to besiege Joppa. Djehuty meets the rebel king in a parlay and captures him and then according to the story he declares that he can no longer lay siege. To trick the inhabitants of Joppa he sends them tribute in large baskets, but within the baskets are hidden 200 men which then infiltrate the city and capture it. After having taken Joppa he sends a victory proclamation to Thutmose III. This may be an example of the first recorded historical fiction. Most likely Djehuty took part in many of Thutmose III's Syrian campaigns and was in charge of the Asiatic regions.

Nehi (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Is mentioned as the Viceroy of Kush in Thutmose III's 22nd or 23rd de facto year of rule. He was chosen to replace the Hatshepsut appointee in Kush, probably as a safer and more loyal official. As there were campaigns and upheaval in Nubia during Thutmose III's reign it is likely that Nehi played some role. He is also recorded as taking part in Thutmose III's Syria campaigns. Many inscriptions with Nehi's name were found in Nubia which shows many construction projects. Like many favored officials Nehy was also buried in Thebes. His lavish sarcophagus, made of limestone demonstrates his importance and social status.

Usersatet (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Appointed Viceroy of Kush by Amenhotep II. This pharaoh ordered that the corpse of a rebel prince of Syria should be displayed above the gates of Napata to dissuade the Nubians from rebelling. At some point Amenhotep II campaigned in Nubia and in a shrine to this viceroy he is shown receiving tribute. The pharaoh ordered many settlements, to be built in Nubia as well as temples. Usersatet undoubtedly took part in these campaigns and carried out the extensive construction projects (some of his own initiative). His image and inscriptions appear carved into a cliff on the Nile island of Sehel. Usersatet was likely an important noble and confidant of the pharaoh and may have also accompanied Amenhotep II on his campaign in Syria.

Thutmose IV (18th Dynasty) (1430 BC-1388 BC) - The oldest son and heir of the last great warrior pharaoh Amenhotep II. He benefited from the power and wealth which had been secured by his predecessors. His father had campaigned in Syria against the Empire of Mitanni and also secured a peace agreement with them. Thutmose IV also made agreements with the Mitanni which probably included terms for a permanent peace and an alliance. During his reign Thutmose IV undertook a campaign to suppress a minor uprising in Nubia and supposedly a minor expedition in Canaan or Syria. His actions in Nubia were likely to defend the important gold mines from Nubian raids. He reigned for only ten years, short for a pharaoh of that period, and his reign was fairly peaceful. Egyptian power was firmly cemented and there were no clear foreign rivals. To increase his personal control and take power from the clergy, he promoted the Cult of the Sun, a policy which his father had also done.

Amenhotep, viceroy (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - The Viceroy of Kush during the reign of Thutmose IV and part of the reign of Amenhotep III. He most likely was involved in the suppression of insurgencies and raids in the reign of Thutmose IV. Probably continuing these policing actions and securing tribute from the Nubians into the reign of Amenhotep III. In his inscription on the island of Sehel he is mentioned as having many important titles; "overseer of the cattle of Amun, overseer of works in Upper and Lower Egypt, chief of the stalls of his majesty, overseer of the southern foreign lands and king's scribe".

Amenhotep III (18th Dynasty) (1410 BC-1351 BC) - The son and successor of Thutmose IV, his reign was long and peaceful. Much of his reign is characterized by a high concentration of wealth acquired from mines in Nubia, foreign tribute and trade (as written in the foreign correspondence of the Amarna Letters). During this time Egypt was the supreme power in the Near East and had no rivals abroad. The New Kingdom benefited from the conquests and treaties of the many warrior pharaohs of the past; the kings in Syria were firmly under Egyptian rule. The Mitannian Empire which ruled the Euphrates and Khabur Rivers were allied to Amenhotep III. The King of Mitanni, Shuttarna II, sent his daughter Gilukhepa in marriage (10th year of Amehotep III's rule, around 1378). His successor Tushratta also sent his daughter Tadukhipa in marriage (over 20 years later, around 1350 BC). Although there were conflicts in Mitanni and Hatti, the Egyptian state was stable and Amenhotep III secured his borders using solid diplomacy. Within the country the pharaoh increased his power and control over the state, a policy of centralization which continued under his successor. Simultaneously the priesthood, especially the priests of Amun, had also increased in power and wealth. He therefore continued the policy of his father and grandfather to promote his Cult of the Sun. Exploiting the wealth and prosperity of the realm, the pharaoh also undertook massive construction projects all across the Nile. His only recorded military campaign was during his 5th regnal year, putting down an uprising in Nubia (around 1386 or 1384). While the army was relatively strong he used much of the money for other projects and also began to hire mercenaries from the Levant and Anatolia. His son Prince Thutmose was appointed "Overseer of Priests" and held multiple titles as a priest in his own right, showing clearly attempts to curtail the power of the clergy. While Thutmose was the intended heir, he predeceased his father and instead the pharaoh was succeeded by his other son Akhenaten.

Merymose (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Merymose became the Viceroy of Kush for the rest of Amenhotep III's reign. His tenure in Kush must have included securing the gold mines and other resources as well as sending vast amounts of tribute to the capital. All of this wealth was used for Amenhotep III's state projects and centralized administration. He was most likely in charge during the uprising done by the Nubians in the 5th year of Amenhotep III. He may have also led an expedition to a region called Ibhet, perhaps a punitive raid. It was said that 312 Nubians were killed and 740 were captured in Ibhet. At the start of Amenhotep III's reign, the Egyptians controlled the Nile as far south as the fifth Cataract and Merymose was tasked with maintaining this control. He was also rewarded with many titles and positions: "Overseer of the Southern Lands, Overseer of the Gold Lands of Amun, King's Scribe, Overseer of the King's Scribes, Overseer of the Treasury, and Steward of the Peasantry".

Yuya (18th Dynasty) - A wealthy noble from the town of Akhmim in Upper Egypt. During the time of Amenhotep III he was appointed "King's Lieutenant" and "Master of the Horse", therefore Yuya was an important adviser and official of the pharaoh. Amenhotep III married his daughter Tiye and so Yuya was further honored as "Father of the god". In addition to this he was also made a priest of the god Min and "Superintendent of the cattle of Min". His son Anen was also an important official of Amenhotep III. He was buried with his wife Tjuyu in a luxurious tomb in the Valley of the Kings. His roles as King's Lieutenant and Master of the Horse have a military connotation as an important administrator and adviser. However he likely was not a field commander and so his role could be described as a staff position and an administrative role within the government. Thus making him one of the foremost administrative and military authorities of Egypt.

Akhenaten (18th Dynasty) (1370 BC-1334 BC) - The second son and heir (rule started 1353 or 1351 BC) of the powerful Amenhotep III. He was originally called Amehotep IV but very early in his reign he changed his name to Akhenaten to signify his new religious policies of permitting only the worship of, or at least elevating above other gods, the Sun Cult (the deity Aten). He also moved the capital to a newly built city called Akhetaten (Amarna), which he dedicated to the god Aten. Indeed this was only a continuation of the policies of his father and grandfather to weaken the priests and a larger trend of centralizing the state. It is said that he purged many officials and members of the clergy. In the meantime however, these policies of centralization were becoming unpopular among the nobility, clergy and peasantry alike. Incidentally there seems to have also occurred a drought or some kind of famine. This only increased the level of dissent, plotting against the king and social polarization which resulted in unspecified violence and insurrection. Since he inherited a powerful and stable kingdom Akhenaten did not have to worry about foreign threats in the early part of his reign. Nubia was firmly under control and a source of valuable resources, only one revolt is recorded and promptly put down by his viceroy Thuthmosis. The kings in Syria and Canaan were vassals of the Egyptian king. In the Euphrates Tushratta of Mitanni was still allied to the Egyptians and sent Amenhotep III his daughter Tadukhipa in marriage. He died soon after and Akhenaten took her as one of his wives; yet Tushratta was not satisfied with the dowry of gold plates, expecting golden statues instead. The importance of diplomacy in securing the realm was still present under this pharaoh as it had been under his father. However starting around 1340 BC the Hittites under their new ruler Suppiluliuma began an aggressive policy of conquest. This would have increased tensions in Egypt but no army was able to threaten Egypt itself. Instead Suppiluliuma invaded Syria and Mesopatamia on various campaigns. His main obstacle which was Mitanni lay helpless because after the assassination of king Artashumara his family members engaged in a long period of civil wars. As such Tushratta had to simultaneously fight against the Hittites to the north west and the rival claimant Artatama II, who was supported by Assyria. To make matters worse Tushratta was assassinated and Artatama II became incapable, his son and co-ruler Shuttarna III was able to take hold of all the Mitannian territory but to no avail. He still faced rival claimants in the form of rebellious officials and his family member Shattiwaza. At the same time Suppiluliuma attempted to make off with all of Syria, not even Egyptian support was enough for the Mittani and Syrian princes to stop the Hittites. At the same time there were conflicts between the various kings in Canaan and Syria throughout Akhenaten's reign. The kings of Shechem and Jerusalem were at odds; the king of Amurru and his son invaded Byblos; Sidon intervened against Byblos. Akhenaten refused to intervene in either conflict even after these rulers requested support. Perhaps exacerbated by instability in Egypt and thus a difficulty to effectively field a stronger army. Finally Akhenaten died in the midst of these conflicts and his death caused further turmoil in Egypt. He was succeeded by his son or brother Smenkhkare and his daughter Meritaten (maybe also his wife Nefertiti). Both died soon after under mysterious circumstances. During which time Suppiluliuma attempted to send one of his sons to claim the throne of Egypt, he was murdered and the Hittites vented their anger by invading Syria yet again and conquering Mitanni, during the reign of Akhenaten's young son Tutankhamun. Akhenaten's tomb was defaced after his death and subsequent rulers Ay and Horemheb erased his cultural and material legacy.

Mahu (18th Dynasty) - The "Chief of the Medjay" at the capital of Amarna under Akhenaten. The Medjay were originally a tribe of Nubians which served as mercenary and later an elite unit from Ahmose I to Thutmose I. Eventually the term Medjay referred to Nubian troops used as a guard unit. Hence Mahu was more or less in charge of the police unit within the capital. His time in Amarna would have coincided with the social conflicts at the time and his duty was to police the capital, destroy threatening individuals and suppress dissent. Policing the capital and security as a form of anti-insurgency more or less. He is buried in the Amarna tombs of the pharaoh's nobles and courtiers. His tomb depicts the policing units and watch towers which he used around the pharaoh's new capital.

Ramose (18th Dynasty) - Very little is known about Ramose. He is buried in the great tombs at Amarna. In the tomb inscriptions he is referred to as "Scribe of Recruits" and "General of the Lord of the Two Lands". Which means that he held an important military office over the whole of Egypt but was also responsible for administrative roles within the army. What role he had in suppressing the populace and nobility during this tumultuous period or if he led campaigns against the Nubians or Asiatics can only be inferred.

May (18th Dynasty) - He was another of Akhenaten's officers. May was referred to as "Hereditary Prince, royal chancellor, a sole companion, scribe of the King, fan-bearer and the Overseer of all the works of the King, Overseer of the soldiery of the Lord of the Two lands and scribe of recruits", among other ceremonial and religious roles. May had many important military roles which included that of a nation wide army command but was also a confidant of the king. However in his tomb at Amarna the general declared "I was a poor man on both my father's and my mother's side; but the ruler built me up, he developed me, he fed me by means of his spirit; thus says the king's fan-bearer, May".

Paatenemheb (18th Dynasty) - One of Akhenaten's main generals. Other than that he was Commander of the Lord of the Two Lands and Steward of the Lord of the Two Lands, not much is known about him. Perhaps it can be assumed that he fought in the insurrection in Nubia or the Hittite invasions of Syria. Or perhaps in keeping the peace within Egypt during the chaotic Amarna period. He was buried in Amarna, which indicates that he was loyal to Akhenaten or that he died before the internal issues erupted.

Thuthmosis, viceroy (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - This man was the Viceroy of Kush during the reign of Akhenaten. In the 12th year of Akhenaten's rule Thuthmosis was sent to quell a rebellion by the Nubians. After which he probably put up a stele in Buhen since he is the only Viceroy mentioned in the reign of Akhenaten. If this is the case then he must have been a close confidant of Akhenaten as he was not only appointed Viceroy but also remained in spite of Akhenaten's purges and centralization policies. His tenure in Kush must have also been quite long if he was in that position for the entire reign (assuming Akhenaten had a Viceroy the entire time, almost 20 years). His many titles include: "Overseer of the Gold Lands of Amun, Overseer of masons, Overseer of the borderlands of His Majesty, and Fan-bearer on the King's right". These titles imply responsibilities in sending gold from Nubia to the court, being in charge of construction projects and the last position was an important adviser and staff officer of the king.

Amenhotep Huy (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Amenhotep was also called Huy, at one point the scribe of Merymose and scribe of the pharaoh. The only Viceroy of Kush recorded during the reign of Tutankhamun, he might have been appointed by the Grand Vizier Ay during the child king's regency. Not much is recorded about his tenure or the events in this time in general. Presumably he held Nubia during the crisis and social upheaval in the aftermath of Akhenaten and Tutankhamun's reigns. Possibly he put down a revolt during Tutankhamun's reign. Huy is depicted as Tutankhamun's fan-bearerm which was a role as an adviser and staff officer. Huy's wife Taemwadjsy was chief of the harem. Their tomb is in the large complex near Thebes called the Valley of the Nobles. Their son was the viceroy Paser I.

Amenemopet, scribe of the letters (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - Is recorded on the sarcophagus of Merymose as his scribe in Kush (in the time of Amenhotep III). He was also the scribe of the Viceroy of Kush Thuthmosis (in the reign of Akhenaten). Finally in the reign of Tutankhamun he is mentioned as the adjutant of Viceroy Amenhotep Huy. Hence Amenemopet was a staff officer in charge of army administration.


Smenkhkare (18th Dynasty) (r 1335 BC-1334 BC) - Almost nothing is known of this pharaoh since much of the Amarna period was erased by Ay and Horemheb. Some of the reliefs indicate that he may have been a son or brother of Akhenaten. He is depicted as a co-ruler alongside Akhenaten and was married to Akhenaten's elder daughter Meritaten. He is also recorded as having ruled on his own for a year or two. By the end of the reign of Akhenaten the New Kingdom experienced social conflict, it is possible that Smenkhkare was killed or assassinated as a result. What exactly occurred during this time is largely unknown, however his wife Meritaten also vanishes from the records around this time. It is also unclear whether the Hittite ruler Suppiluliuma's campaigns in Syria coincide with the death of Smenkhkare or the death of Tutankhamun a decade later. It appears that after his death his wife Meritaten ruled Egypt for about a year or two before being removed mysteriously.

Tutankhamun (18th Dynasty) (1341 BC-1323 BC) - He was the son of Akhenaten and possibly the brother or nephew of Smenkhkare as well as the brother of queen Meritaten. His accession to the throne appears to be unexpected and sudden as Akhenaten, Smenkhkare and Meritaten disappear in short order. Since he became pharaoh at age 8 or 9 around 1332 BC he did not exercise control. State affairs were done by his vizier, who were at different times Pentu and Usermontu. Somehow Ay became Grand Vizier and dominated the court. Initially the king was known as Tutankhaten, but his name was changed to Tutankhamun in order to be reconciled with the polytheistic clergy and populace (for instance Amarna was abandoned and the capital was moved back to Thebes). He was also married to his sister Ankhesenamun (originally Ankhesenpa-aten) to strengthen his claim. Much of his reign was spent satisfying the clergy, attempting to pacify the populace, dealing with severe economic troubles and drought and being at the receiving end of an invasion by the Hittite conqueror Suppiluliuma. From about 1340 BC in his father's time, the Hittites invaded Syria and the Euphrates regions in multiple campaigns. By around 1325 the Mitanni, which were Egyptian allies, were conquered by Suppiluliuma. Tutankhamun was faced with continual invasions throughout his reign, Suppiluliuma did not die until about 1322 or 1320 BC, he may have outlived Tutankhamun. The Pharaoh probably began to exercise control around 1325 BC until his sudden death in 1323 BC (roughly from age 15 to 18). In his tomb are depicted campaigns against Nubians and Asiatics. The campaign in Nubia might refer to the action carried out by the viceroy Huy. It is uncertain whether the campaigns against Asiatics refers to the Hittite invasions, or rebellions by the kings in Syria and Canaan. It is also not known whether Tutankhamun led any of these campaigns in person, but weapons and armor were found in his tomb. He died from an abrupt illness or injury at the age of 18, though some wonder whether he was assassinated. While he was buried with many treasures his tomb was unknown and out of sight and records of his rule were erased, probably by his successors Ay or Horemheb. Horemheb's inscriptions imply that the king died shortly after campaigning against the Asiatics.

Ay (18th Dynasty) (1380 BC-1319 BC) - Since it is believed that Ay was born in Akhmim it is sometimes theorized that his father was the earlier Yuya. Either way Ay was influential during the reign of Akhenaten and is first mentioned as a troop captain and then overseer of horses. At some point during Akhenaten's reign he was promoted to "Overseer of all the Horses of His Majesty" which was an administrative role in charge of chariotry just short of an army commander. Ay is also depicted on a stone block receiving the gold of honor for his deeds in the army. He was later given the honors "Fan-bearer on the Right Side of the King", "Acting Scribe of the King" and "God's Father", the latter likely indicating that his daughter was Nefertiti, Akhenaten's main wife. Frustratingly there is a lack of records which cover the social upheaval of the Amarna period and it is not clear what military undertakings were done by Ay during those events, if any. At some point Ay became Grand Vizier, possibly as a result of Akhenaten's death and the eventual succession of the child king Tutankhamun around 1332 BC (aged 8 or 9). As Grand Vizier and possibly Regent, it seems that Ay moved towards a policy of conciliation with the Egyptian clergy and restored the old polytheist cults. From around 1340 the Hittites under Suppiluliuma invaded Syria and warred against Mitanni and Egypt. The Mitanni were a crucial ally of the Egyptians but by about 1325 BC were subjugated by the Hittites. Syria and the Euphrates had fallen into Hittite hands, Canaan lay vulnerable to invasion if not sedition, Egypt lacked order and was now threatened by a foreign invader. Suppiluliumas' rampage continued until about 1322 or 1320 BC, stopped only by his sudden death. Between 1325 to 1323 BC Tutankhamun was reaching his age of majority but died suddenly. Ay was made Pharaoh using his position as Grand Vizier, his title "Father of the god" and probably married the king's widow Ankhesenamun (who was the daughter of Ay's own daughter Nefertiti). However it appears that Tutankhamun had actually appointed the general Horemheb as "Deputy of the Two Lands" and thereby the likely heir. Ay must have outmaneuvered Horemheb politically and made himself pharaoh. He then made his son or adopted son, the general Nakhtmin, as his designated heir. Since Ay was rather old his reign was short, but unexpectedly queen Ankhesenamun and his son Nakhtmin vanished mysteriously and Horemheb became Pharaoh.

Nakhtmin, generalissimo (18th Dynasty) - Nakhtmin was possibly the son or adopted son of the Grand Vizier Ay. He is mentioned during the reign of Tutankhamun as "Great overseer of troops", "overseer of the troops of the lord of the two lands", "overseer of troops", "the true servant who is beneficial to his lord", "the king's scribe", "the servant beloved of his lord", "the fan-bearer on the right side of the king" and "the servant who causes to live the name of his lord". His titles are largely court positions, fan-bearers were advisers and had military organizational roles as officers. The ranks of overseer, especially Great overseer is a sign of supreme military importance. It is unknown if he led any campaigns into Canaan, Syria or Nubia during the reign of Tutankhamun, or what he did during the civil conflicts of this time. After Tutankhamun abruptly died the Grand Vizier Ay became pharaoh. Nakhtmin was made Ay's successor however Ay's reign was short and Nakhtmin vanishes. It can be inferred that Nakhtmin's rival was the general Horemheb, as the latter had Nakhtmin erased from the records.

Seti, commander of the lord (18th Dynasty) - Military officer under Tutankhamun, probably also a vizier under Ay and Horemheb. He was likely from a prominent family in Lower Egypt. It is unknown whether he fought in Canaan or Nubia or what role he played during the civil conflicts and social upheaval resulting from Akhenaten and Tutankhamun's reigns. Seti's son Paramessu eventually became Ramesses I and founded the 19th Dynasty. In Ramesses I's monuments Seti is referred to as a vizier and the "commander of the lord of the two lands", implying much political and military importance. Positions which he probably held under Ay or Horemheb.

Khaemwaset, chief of bowmen of Kush (18th Dynasty) - He was probably the brother of the military leader Seti and the uncle of Ramesses I. Being from a military family of Lower Egypt it is fitting that he would have become chief of the Nubian archers which served as one of the pharaoh's elite units. His name is likely mentioned in a statue from the reign of Tutankhamun as chief of the Nubian archers. Khaemwaset is also referred to as a "royal fan-bearer", which was a prestigious position in the pharaoh's court as an adviser and staff officer. It is unclear what he did during the turmoil of Tutankhamun's reign and subsequent period. Most likely he was crucial in supporting Horemheb and eventually the accession of his nephew Ramesses I. He is depicted alongside his brother Seti and nephew Ramesses I in a stele of the latter's reign.

Paser I (Kush, 18th Dynasty) - The Viceroy of Kush for pharaohs Ay and Horemheb and also the son of viceroy Huy. The only inscription relating to viceroy Paser I dates to the reign of Ay around 1320 BC. The next recorded Viceroy of Kush is not until the reign of Seti I. Hence it is possible that Paser I served as viceroy under Ay, Horemheb and Ramesses I. During those times there was much political and social turmoil within Egypt itself. It is not known whether this also caused the Egyptians to lose territory in Kush, if so then Paser I might not have been viceroy throughout their entire reigns, or at least not viceroy over all of what had been previously conquered. It does appear that control of Nubia was largely retained during the tumultuous Amarna period since Seti I's campaigns in the area later on are described as anti-insurgency campaigns. In the temple of Aniba, Paser I is depicted in reverence of Horemheb which does imply that he survived the transfer of power and remained during the reign of Horemheb in some capacity. He is mentioned as having the following titles: "Overseer of the Gold Lands of Amun, King’s Son of Kush, overseer of the Southern Lands. Overseer of the Lands of Amun in Ta-Set, Overseer of the Gold Lands. King's scribe". His son was the later Viceroy of Kush, Amenemopet, during the Ramesside period.

Horemheb (18th Dynasty) (1350 BC-1292 BC) - Was born in Hnes, one of the districts of Upper Egypt. It is debated by scholars whether he was a commoner who rose through the ranks or if he was from the nobility. He is first mentioned in the reign of Tutankhamun and depicted next to the pharaoh. His first role was in leading diplomatic missions abroad, he traveled to visit the Nubian vassal princes in such a capacity. According to the inscriptions on the Saqqara tomb from Tutankhamun's reign, he was made "Hereditary Prince, Fan-bearer on the Right Side of the King, Great Overseer of Troops, attendant of the King in his footsteps in the foreign countries of the south and the north, King's Messenger in front of his army to the foreign countries to the south and the north, and Sole Companion, he who is by the feet of his lord on the battlefield on that day of killing Asiatics". The latter suggests that Horemheb was one of the major army commanders and officials and that both he and Tutankhamun led the army in a campaign into Asia (in Canaan, Syria or against the Hittites?). Not long after Tutankhamun died but it seems that Horemheb had been appointed "Deputy of the Two Lands" and "Hereditary Prince", which not only denotes an extreme amount of power but also implies that Horemheb was the intended successor. Horemheb would rank as one of the major military figures of that time, together with Huy and Nakhtmin. In his personal inscriptions Horemheb boasted that he was a personal friend and adviser to the king and that he alone could assuage the king's anger. Through some manner or political trick Ay was able to take the throne instead, perhaps Horemheb was away on campaign at the time. Interestingly enough Horemheb did not marry queen Ankhesenamun. But Ay died after a short reign, likely from old age and his intended successor Nakhtmin as well as queen Ankhesenamun vanish from the record. Horemheb is then recorded as being the new Pharaoh which he most likely accomplished by using the army to orchestrate a coup. His main wife was Mutnedjmet, likely the daughter of Ay and the sister of Nefertiti. He desecrated Ay's tomb and erased his rivals from history, but did not damage the tomb of Tutankhamun. As pharaoh Horemheb succeeded in ruling the country and restoring order to the people. He controlled the clergy, issued edicts to reorganize the administration of the state and appointed new priests and civil servants. He also divided Egypt into two administrations and appointed a viceroy in Lower Egypt and a viceroy in upper Egypt. In addition to this he carried out a construction campaign with inscriptions to legitimize his rule. He does not seem to have undertaken significant campaigns during his rule but he reorganized the army and labor forces. Somehow he was able to reclaim parts of Canaan and Syria, probably using diplomacy and military force (or the threat of force). Despite this he was unable to support his allies in Carchemish and suffered a setback at the hands of the Hittites in his 10th year. Horemheb probably also signed a peace with the then Hittite king Mursili II. Apparently he was unable to produce an heir and so he appointed his commander and vizier, Paramessu, as his successor, who adopted the name Ramesses I. For this reason Horemheb is often seen as the last pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty and the first pharaoh of the 19th Dynasty.

(2) Great Commanders of Classical Antiquity

Iron Age (1100 BC-500 BC)

Ashur-nasir-apli II (905 BC-859 BC) -

Tukulti-apil-Esharra III (775 BC-727 BC) -

Sharrukin II (760 BC-705 BC) -

Ashur-bani-apli (685 BC-627 BC) -

Nabu-apla-usur (658 BC-605 BC) - Known as Nabopolassar; a member of the Chaldean people and an official in Babylonia. After the death of Ashurbanipal the Assyrians were plagued by civil war, Nabopolassar took advantage of this to lead a revolt against the Assyrians in Babylonia. He had attempted to besiege the nearby fortress of Nippur but was defeated when the Assyrians sent a relief force. Still he successfully took Babylon (between 626 BC and 623 BC) and was made king by the population. The Assyrians retook Uruk in the south around 624, the Babylonians quickly took it again. Another civil war broke out in Assyria in 623 and an invasion force had to withdraw from Babylonia. Nabopolassar quickly consolidated his rule in Babylonia, taking Nippur after another attempt in 620 or 619. He followed up by invading Assyria but was defeated and forced to withdraw. Instead he spent the next four years reducing the remaining Assyrian positions and fighting Assyrian forces still active in Babylonia. Finally he assembled an army and invaded the Assyrian heartland in the north-east. In 616 he crossed the Tigris to the east, defeated the Assyrians at Arrapha and drove them across the Little Zab River. In 615 the Medes invaded Assyria and took Tarbisu in the north. With the aid of the Medes under Cyaxeres they took Ashur (614) and Nineveh (612) in the Tigris and then Harran (610) in the Euphrates (in addition to Gasur, Dur-Sharrukin, Kalhu, Ekallatum and Arbela in the Tigris). The Assyrians that held out in the west allied with the Egyptian Pharaoh Necho II. With their support Necho II besieged Harran in 609 BC, Nabopolassar and his Mede allies relieved the city. thus ending the Assyrian Empire. Later in his reign he sent his son Nebuchadnezzar west to conquer the Arameans, Phoenicians, Cilicians and Jews and to contest this territory with the Egyptians. His son defeated the Egyptians at Carchemish in 605 and Nabopolassar died shortly afterwards. Nabopolassar destroyed the Neo-Assyrian Empire, established the Neo-Babylonian Empire and reorganized the post-Assyrian world together with the Kings of Lydia, Media and Egypt. In particular by making the alliance between the Babylonians and the Medes, he cemented his rule and that of his successors.

Nabu-kudurri-usur II (634 BC-562 BC) -


Kurosh the Great (580 BC-530 BC) - Kurosh (or Cyrus the Great) was the son of the Persian king Cambyses and the Median princess Mandana. Sources are scarce but it can be inferred that he spent much of his youth in the court of his grandfather Astyages. In Mede service he carried out campaigns against rebellious tribes in the north-west of Iran. He defeated the Cadusians, the Armenians and Chaldeans. According to Xenophon he also took part in border conflicts with the Babylonians. By 559 he had returned to Persia to rule jointly with his father as a vassal king to the Medes. During that time he seems to have increased his control over the region and subjected many of the Persian tribes. However Astyages of the Medes wanted to increase his authority over his vassals thus appointing officials over these subject territories and began to extract more tribute. This culminated in Kurosh carrying out an uprising in 552, during which time he fortified the mountain passes and ambushed a Median cavalry contingent at Hyrba. Astyages then assembled his forces and invaded Persia, Kurosh intercepted their forces on the main road along the border and fought them to a standstill on the first day. On the second day Cyrus secretly withdrew leaving only a contingent, under King Cambyses, to guard the local fortress. Astyages attacked the fortress with the bulk of his forces not realizing that Kurosh had retreated, however Kurosh's father Cambyses died in the battle. Kurosh withdrew to his city at Pasargadae in the south, Astyages marched deeper into Persia and besieged them. However Kurosh resisted them at Pasargadae Hill and successfully repulsed their attacks. At which point it appears that the Medes mutinied and the troops led by Harpagus defected to the Persians. Astyages was then forced to retreat back to his capital at Ecbatana, but perhaps due to his policies and his defeat he began to lose support from his subjects and vassals. The next year in 550, Kurosh invaded Media, taking Ecbatana, and was made King of the Medes. It seems that for the most part the vassal kings accepted Kurosh as their overlord. However King Croesus of Lydia, who was the ally and brother in law of Astyages, did not accept Kurosh's claim. It is possible that Kurosh spent the years 549 and 548 consolidating his power, and also subjecting the local rulers, such as in Urartu. In 547 Kurosh made an audacious move, he crossed the mountains southwards into the Tigris and then marched north into Cappadocia. Croesus was not expecting this maneuver and the two clashed at Pteria along the Halys River. Both armies fought to a standstill and Croesus' heavy cavalry prevented his army from being defeated. Croesus then opted to withdraw back into Lydia and demobilized his army for the winter, keeping only his personal levies and mercenaries from Ionia, Egypt and Babylon. Kurosh again made an audacious move and rather than put his army into winter quarters he marched across the Anatolian mountains into Lydia. The Persians reached the city of Sardis, Croesus decided to give battle and they fought in the plain outside of Sardis, at Thymbra. Kurosh interspersed his flanks with camel units which caused the Lydian cavalry formations to lose cohesion. Then after routing both enemy flanks he outflanked the Lydian infantry in the center and defeated them utterly. Sardis was besieged and eventually it fell to the Persians, after which they sacked the city. At the start of 546 Kurosh returned to Iran, however not long afterwards the Lydians and the Ionians rebelled, killing the local official. Kurosh then sent various generals, including Harpagus, to put down the uprising. Harpagus also went on to subjugate Ionia, Aeolia, Caria and Lycia, he therefore became Kurosh's deputy in Anatolia. Herodotus asserts that during this time Kurosh was campaigning in the east in order to conquer the lands of Margiana, Bactria, Gandara, Drangiana and Sogdia. Largely he defeated the Bactrians and Sogdians using maneuvers, ambush tactics and besieging their citadels. It is possible that he also attempted to cross the Hindu Kush and campaigned in the Gedrosian desert as well as in the Persian Gulf. According to a later tradition, Kurosh lost much of his army in that area between the Hindu Kush and Gedrosia. What is certain is that he added the eastern territories to his empire and secured Gandara in the Hindu Kush, whether he reached the Indus River or not. After Harpagus secured Anatolia and Kurosh conquered the East, the next objective was Babylon. The King Nabonidus records that Kurosh overthrew the Medes and the Lydians but Babylon seems to have not supported their allies except in the most minimal terms. Kurosh had worked to isolate Babylon and began to chip away at their empire. Initially during the conflict with Lydia, Kurosh had marched with his army through the Tigris but it is unclear whether this constituted a violation of Babylonian territory. Babylonian tablets also record that just prior to the Persian invasion, the Babylonians lost contact with Cilicia. Xenophon also asserts that Kurosh invaded in the west first and took Phoenicia and Syria (this may have been carried out simultaneously by Harpagus), although this could have happened after the actual invasion of Babylonia. It is also likely that the Persians secured the buffer state of Elam. Whatever the case Kurosh invaded Babylon in 539 BC. As usual he carried out an unpredictable maneuver; moving his army through the mountains into the border region of Gutium. As the Nabonidus Chronicle records, Kurosh bribed the governors of that region causing them to defect, which permitted his army to march out into the area east of the Tigris, in the center of Mesopotamia. In so doing he would be able to take the most direct route to the city of Babylon. The Persians marched on the city of Opis, having to cross the Tigris so that they could attack Babylon. The Babylonians hastily assembled their army and battled Kurosh outside the city, the outcome was the death of Prince Belshazzar and a resounding victory for the Persians, who then sacked Opis. Then the Persians marched across to the Euphrates, and likely secured the city of Sippar in order to continue onto Babylon (perhaps negotiating its surrender). Nabonidus had retreated to Babylon and walled himself inside the city. Accounts of the fall of Babylon are conflicting. Some sources state that the city surrendered to the Persians when they arrived and accepted Kurosh as king. Other sources record that the Persians either starved the city out by diverting the river or even assaulted the city. Regardless Nabonidus was captured, the Babylonians made peace, and Kurosh became King of Babylon. The Persians then organized all of the Babylonian Empire into provinces and tax districts. Possibly even sending armies west to conquer Aramea and Phoenicia. All of the world powers had fallen to Kurosh save for the Egyptians, who may have placated him by sending tribute. In the meantime Kurosh again turned east and campaigned in Sogdia and Chorasmia. Conflicts in the east as well as consolidating this massive empire were probably the focus of the rest of his reign. In 530 he began a campaign against the Massagetae, nomadic tribes which had probably raided the frontier, but which according to some sources were ruled by a Queen Tomyris. Kurosh crossed the Syr Darya (Jaxartes) and then, according to Herodotus, he ambushed the forces led by the son of Queen Tomyris. Afterwards another battle was fought against Tomyris herself, in which Kurosh was supposedly killed. Although various sources contest the exact nature and outcome of this expedition. For example Xenophon says that Kurosh in fact died in his palace at an old age, others such as Ctesias state that the Persians fought against a tribe called the Derbices led by King Amoraeus. According to Ctesias, although Kurosh was seriously wounded the "Sacae", his allies (perhaps the Sogdians), were able to turn the tide of battle and defeat the Derbices. Kurosh died soon after, having conquered the majority of the known world throughout his thirty year rule.

Dareyavaush the Great (550 BC-486 BC) -


Classical Era (500 BC-360 BC)

Themistokles (524 BC-459 BC) -

Kimon (510 BC-450 BC) - An Athenian who was the son of Miltiades the Younger. He was an officer during the Battle of Salamis against the Persian invaders. He was given command of a fleet and campaigned in the Aegean Sea against islands and coastal cities which were controlled by the Persians. He took Eion and Strymon in Thrace. He defeated a Persian fleet at the mouth of the Eurymedon River near coastal Cilicia and Lycia. Around 463 BC he took the island of Thasos, which had rebelled. Kimon was influential and had positive views towards Sparta, he also opposed Perikles and his Democratic Faction. Perikles had him put on trial for bribery at some point. Kimon led an expedition of 4000 hoplites to aid Sparta against a helot revolt, but when he arrived the paranoid Spartans turned him back. Losing political prestige yet again, Perikles convinced the citizens to have him exiled in 461. Kimon returned around 451 BC, Perikles sent him to Cyprus to conquer it from the Persians and also to support an Egyptian revolt. He besieged Kition and defeated a Persian force in a land-naval operation at Salamis-in-Cyprus. Supposedly he died just prior to the battle and his death was kept secret until after the campaign.

Perikles (495 BC-429 BC) -

Phormion (470 BC-427 BC) -

Alkibiades (450 BC-404 BC) -

Thrasybulos (440 BC-388 BC) -

Lysandros (440 BC-395 BC) -

Agesilaos II (444 BC-360 BC) -

Epaminondas (410 BC-362 BC) -

Pelopidas (410 BC-364 BC) - Had served as an officer or soldier in the siege of Mantinea in 384 BC to support the city of Thebes' Spartan allies. In 383 or 382 BC the Spartans turned on their allies and attacked Thebes. Pelopidas fled to Athens then returned in 379 BC and established a Democratic faction to oppose the Spartan backed oligarchy. He ambushed the political rivals in Thebes and with an army raised from Boeotia and Attica he surrounded the Spartans and reclaimed Thebes, with the support of Epaminondas and Gorgidas. He took part as a general in the Battle of Leuctra in 371 which defeated the Spartans. In 370 BC he and Epaminondas raided the Peloponnese but did not attack Sparta itself. Then in 369 BC he undertook a campaign into Thessaly to chase out Alexandros of Pherae and expanding the Theban Hegemony. Continuing into Makedonia he installed his own claimant on the throne (Perdikkas III). Returning to Makedonia in 368 his mercenaries mutinied and he was captured by Alexandros of Pherae. Thebes sent two expeditions into Thessaly to procure his release. He spent much of 367 in Persia trying to secure Persian support for the Theban Hegemony over Greece. In 364 BC he went on another campaign into Thessaly and defeated Alexandros of Pherae at Cynoscephalae. Although he won that battle he was killed in the fighting. In revenge Epaminondas invaded and defeated Alexandros of Pherae (363 BC). The loss of Pelopidas was a serious blow to Thebes. Even more so because Epaminondas died fighting Sparta and Athens the next year.


Makedonia and the Diadochi (360 BC-270 BC)

Philippos II (382 BC-336 BC)

Alexandros III the Great (356 BC-323 BC)

Antigonos I Monophthalmos (382 BC-301 BC)

Eumenes of Cardia (362 BC-316 BC)

Seleukos I Nikator (358 BC-281 BC)

Chandragupta Maurya (340 BC-297 BC)

Agathokles (361 BC-289 BC)

Pyrrhos I of Epeiros (319 BC-272 BC)


Hellenistic Era (270 BC-139 BC)

Kleomenes III (260 BC-219 BC)

Antiochos III the Great (241 BC-187 BC)

Hamilcar Barca (275 BC-228 BC)

Hannibal Barca (247 BC-183 BC)

Marcus Claudius Marcellus (270 BC-208 BC) - A Roman commander who started his career leading a campaign against the Gauls of northern Italy in 225 BC. At the start of the 2nd Punic War (218 BC) he was sent to cover a potential naval invasion of southern Italy and to defeat an uprising in Syracuse in 216 BC. After Hannibal defeated the Romans at Cannae, Marcellus was held back and kept in Campania to check Hannibal's advance southwards. He prevented Hannibal from taking Nola three times from 216 BC to 214 BC. From 213 to 212 BC he besieged Syracuse and pacified Sicily. He fought again to a stand still at Numistro in Lucania (210) and Canusium in Apulia (209). In 208 BC he was ambushed by a scouting party and killed. During his campaigns he avoided open battles with Hannibal and halted the advance of his Punic armies, a similar application to Fabius Maximus' strategy.

Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus (236 BC-183 BC)

Titus Quinctius Flamininus (229 BC-174 BC)

Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemelianus (185 BC-129 BC)

Viriathus (170 BC-139 BC)


Supremacy of the Roman Republic (139 BC-20 BC)

Gaius Marius (157 BC-86 BC)

Lucius Cornelius Sulla (138 BC-78 BC)

Gnaeus Pompeius Strabo (135 BC-87 BC)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius (130 BC-63 BC)

Quintus Sertorius (123 BC-72 BC)

Lucius Licinius Lucullus (118 BC-56 BC)

Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (106 BC-48 BC)

Gaius Julius Caesar (100 BC-44 BC)

Titus Labienus (99 BC-45 BC)

Marcus Antonius (83 BC-30 BC)

Monaeses Suren (83 BC-20 BC)

Publius Ventidius Bassus (100 BC-27 BC)

Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa (63 BC-12 BC)


Early Roman Empire (20 BC-180 AD)

Tiberius Claudius Nero (42 BC-37) -

Nero Claudius Drusus Germanicus (38 BC-9 BC) -

Germanicus Julius Caesar (15 BC-19) - Was the son of the Roman general Nero Claudius Drusus Germanicus, and the nephew of Emperor Tiberius. He had many political roles in the reign of Emperor Augustus and was made Proconsul of Germania Inferior, Germania Superior and the three Gallic provinces. With eight legions he crossed the Rhine in 13 AD and carried out three campaigns against Arminius and his allies in order to avenge the disaster at Teutoburg. He defeated Arminius at Idistaviso and the Angrivarian Wall in 16 AD. Having marched as far as the Weser River, reclaimed the three lost eagles and broken up Arminius' coalition, he was recalled by Emperor Tiberius. He was largely regarded as the successor to his uncle Tiberius. In 17 AD Germanicus Caesar celebrated a triumph over the Germanic tribes. He was sent to exercise control over the whole of the Eastern provinces. Touring Greece and the east he then marched into Armenia to install the vassal Artaxias as king. He also organized the Kingdom of Cappadocia into a Roman province as its vassal king had died. In addition to that he made the Kingdom of Commagene a province as well. Germanicus then traveled to Egypt to aid in the relief of a famine. During his stay in the East he had made a few enemies from local officials and his trip to Egypt insulted Tiberius' paranoid sensibilities. He died of an illness in 19 AD while at Antioch, many have speculated that he was poisoned by one of these rivals. His son Caligula would become the successor for Emperor Tiberius.

Aulus Plautius (4-57) - The general who commanded Claudius' invasion of Britain. He established the Roman foothold on the island and conquered the eastern region. Afterwards he served as governor of Britannia for five years and he expanded the Roman foothold out of the Cantiaci and Trinovantes lands to the north and west.

Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo (7-67) - A Roman general that campaigned along the Rhine in the reign of Claudius and against the Parthians in the reign of Nero. Successfully invaded Armenia, organized the defense of Syria and invaded Mesopotamia to defeat the Parthians.

Titus Flavius Vespasianus (9-79) - His first command was under Aulus Plautius in Britain as the Legate of Legio II. According to the sources he performed well in the main campaign against the Catuvellauni and was then sent to subdue the south west. His career was at its peak under Claudius and Nero and so he took up many state positions such as governor of Africa. Under Nero he was commanded to put down the Great Jewish Revolt which he did systematically. After the murder of Nero and the death of Galba he became a contender for the Imperial title. He received much support from capable officials and the military. Vespasian appointed his son Titus to finish off the Jewish revolt while a portion of his army moved to secure Anatolia and Greece and he personally led a force to take Egypt. With such a shrewd strategy he made his success practically inevitable. At the same time his Danube legions commanded by Mucianus and Marcus Antonius Primus marched into Italy and defeated Vitellius at Bedriacum, then marched across the Appenines and took Rome. Vespasian proved more capable than most of his predecessors and succeeded in governing Italy. During his reign Lucius Silva and Lucilius Bassus finished off the remnants of the rebellious Jews.

Gaius Suetonius Paulinus (10-70) - Was appointed one of the governors of Britain in the reign of Nero. Upon succeeding Quintus Veranus he set to work putting down the Briton revolts in modern Wales. He also conquered new territories in northern Wales. In the meantime Boudicca of the Iceni rebelled and wreaked havoc in the east, Paulinus returned from the west and put down Boudicca's revolt. His methods were considered harsh and Emperor Nero preferred conciliatory policies so Nero recalled him to Rome. During the Year of Four Emperors (69) he sided with Otho and was his commander and adviser. In this capacity he and Aulus Marius Celsus commanded Otho's forces on their march from Gaul into Italy, defeating the forces of Vitellius in two battles and taking Placentia and Cremona. However at Bedriacum the forces of Otho were outnumbered by Vitellius, he suggested to Otho and his brother Titanus that they withdraw but Titanus advised Otho to battle while the Emperor brought reinforcements. Instead Vitellius defeated Paulinus' smaller army and was captured. Emperor Otho killed himself in his camp, upon hearing that his army was defeated.

Gnaeus Julius Agricola (40-93) - A Roman general who served under various governors of Britain. Eventually being promoted to the command of a legion he saw action in many campaigns. During the Year of the Four Emperors he supported Vespasian. Upon seizing power Vespasian appointed him governor of Britain. He put down a revolt in northern Wales and campaigned against the Brigantes in northern England. Then he undertook his famous campaign and invaded the territory of northern Britain, defeating the Britons at Mons Graupius and marched as far as the sea. Receiving tribute and hostages he withdrew into his borders and established the frontier as far as modern Perth.

Marcus Ulpius Trajanus (53-117) -

Publius Aelius Hadrianus (76-138) -


Roman Decline and Crisis of the Third Century (180 AD-284 AD)

Septimius Severus (145-211) -

Ardashir (180-242) -

Shapur the Great (215-270) -

Lucius Domitius Aurelianus (214-275) -


Late Roman Empire (284 AD-480 AD)

Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus the Great (272-337) -

Shapur II (309-379) -

Flavius Claudius Julianus the Apostate (331-363) -

Samudragupta (320-375) -

Flavius Stilicho (359-408) -

Flavius Aetius (391-454) -

Attila the Hun (400-453) -

Genseric (389-477) -

(6) Great Commanders of the Far East

Ancient East Asia (1100 BC-300 AD) Jiang Ziya (1100 BC-1030 BC) - Sun Bin (380 BC-316 BC) - Bai Qi (320 BC-257 BC) - Wang Jian (280...